Search for: "G. V."
Results 1 - 20
of 19,176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 9:22 am
G v de Visser (Case C-292/10); [2012] WLR (D) 87 “Where it was impossible to locate the whereabouts of a defendant, European Union law did not preclude the issue of judgment by default in circumstances where the document instituting proceedings had been served by public notice under national law, provided that the court seised of the matter had first satisfied itself that all investigations required by the principles of diligence and good faith had been undertaken to trace… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 10:45 am
G v HM Treasury; A and others v Same [2008] EWCA Civ 1187; [2008] WLR (D) 339 “The Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 was lawful and validly made under s 1 of the United Nations Act 1946 provided certain words were severed from art 4(2) so that it required the Treasury to show that it had reasonable grounds for suspecting that the person designated was involved in committing or facilitating terrorism and not merely might be such a person. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 10:40 am
G v HM Treasury A and Others v Same Court of Appeal “Two antiterror Orders in Council made under section 1 of the United Nations Act 1946 to implement Security Council resolutions were lawful and valid, subject to important conditions. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:46 am
Regina v S (G) [2012] WLR (D) 28 “The transmission of electronically stored data to only one recipient is sufficient publication with section 1(3) of the Obscene Publications Act 1959 for the purposes of a prosecution under that Act.” WLR Daily, 9th February 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:23 am
WISEMAN v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:28 pm
NOT CHARGED – Discharging a Firearm, State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:24 am
R v G; R v J [2009] UKHL 13; [2009] WLR (D) 80 “To rely on the defence in s 58(3) of the Terrorism Act 2000 a defendant had to show an objectively ‘reasonable excuse’ for his action or possession and a ruling that neither a desire to ‘wind up’ prison officers nor mental illness could [...] [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:55 pm
He asks what I think of the Lords' judgment last week in R v G. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:11 am
Regina v G (Terrorism: Information); Regina v J (terrorism: Information) House of Lords “To secure a conviction, the prosecution was not required to show that a defendant had had a terrorist purpose for collecting or recording information of a kind likely to be useful to a terrorist or possessing a document or record containing information of that [...] [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:07 am
R v G(G) and Another Court of Appeal “Where the Court of Appeal was determining whether it was in the interests of justice for an acquittal to be quashed on an application by the Crown, the factors specified in section 79(2) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 were not exhaustive. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:21 pm
DISMISSED – Hit and Run, State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:29 am
V. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 8:17 am
GUZMAN-FUENTES v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:41 am
NEUSTADT ) v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 2:44 am
Regina (G) v Governors of X School Queen’s Bench Division “An employee of a school facing a disciplinary committee for allegations of sexual misconduct was entitled to an enhanced measure of procedural protection afforded by article 6.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, guaranteeing the right to a fair hearing, which included the right to legal [...] [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:15 am
REDUCED to 90 Days Jail – Probation Violation, State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:58 pm
Following on from my recent post about the role of Guideline Hourly Rates in detailed assessment hearings comes the decision in G (by her mother and litigation friend M) v Kingston upon Hull City Council (Kingston upon Hull County Court, 18/09/13). [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:35 am
Regina (G) v Southwark London Borough Council House of Lords “A local authority's children's services unit could not purport to fulfil its duties to look after a homeless child merely by referring him to the homeless persons unit. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 6:23 am
HARRIS v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:03 am
Regina (G) v Southwark London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 26; [2009] WLR (D) 159 “When a child aged 16 or 17 who had been excluded from his family home applied to the children's service department of the local authority for accommodation under s 20 of the Children Act 1989, and he satisfied all the requirements of [...] [read post]
